Annotation Publication/2018523/5
(Boards Test, Rev.) Vote
no - testing rejection
May 23, 2018 14:36
Annotation Publication/2018523/8
(cite/perseus/lattb.7600.1) Vote
yes - testing approval
May 23, 2018 14:37
Annotation Publication/2018523/5
(Boards Test, Rev.) Vote
yes - Successfully revised
May 31, 2018 14:52
Annotation Publication/2018829/61
(1.2-3_PS) Vote
no - Good work, Paige. I made note of a few tweaks that caught my eye, and we'll go over the sentences more thoroughly in class. (Also, apologies for the duplicate comments--a bug on my end!)
August 31, 2018 14:25
Annotation Publication/2018831/1
(Ex 1.2-3__AB) Vote
no - Good work, Andrew. You've got the gist of it. I made note of a few tweaks that caught my eye, and we'll go over the sentences more thoroughly in class.
August 31, 2018 14:35
Annotation Publication/2018831/4
(Ex 1.2-3_GF) Vote
no - A good start, Gabriella. I made note of a few tweaks that caught my eye, and we'll go over the sentences more thoroughly in class. Make sure you've finished by then!
August 31, 2018 14:43
Annotation Publication/2018831/3
(Ex 1.2-3_GF) Vote
no - We'll go over this in class too.
August 31, 2018 14:48
Annotation Publication/2018831/2
(1.2/3_TM) Vote
no - Nice work, Tyler. You're getting the hang of it. I made note of a few tweaks that caught my eye, and we'll go over the sentences more thoroughly in class.
August 31, 2018 14:57
Annotation Publication/201891/3
(Ex 1.1_SK) Vote
no - These sentences look good, Seongsoo. I made a few minor comments.
September 04, 2018 14:24
Annotation Publication/2018831/18
(Ex 1.2-3_SK) Vote
no - See you at 10:15.
September 05, 2018 12:10
Annotation Publication/2018831/27
(cite/perseus/lattb.7817.1) Vote
no - Great work, Anthony! Quite a few flawless sentences in here.
September 05, 2018 14:08
Annotation Publication/2018831/26
(EX 2.2_AK) Vote
no - Good work, Adrian! Some flawless sentences in here.
September 05, 2018 14:13
Annotation Publication/201894/7
(2.1_GN) Vote
no - Nice work, Grant. See comments for a few sticking points.
September 05, 2018 14:21
Annotation Publication/201894/8
(Ex 2.1_MS) Vote
no - Nice work, Matthew. View my comments for some refinements.
September 05, 2018 14:56
Annotation Publication/201894/6
(Ex. 2.1_PS) Vote
no - Well done, Paige. Comments are in the treebanks
September 05, 2018 15:10
Annotation Publication/201893/6
(Ex 2.1_MB) Vote
no - Nice work, Monique. Comments are on the treebanks.
September 05, 2018 15:22
Annotation Publication/201895/7
(2.1_TM) Vote
no - Good work, Tyler. Please read through the comments and follow up if you are still unclear about identifying the main verb and subordinate verb.
September 05, 2018 15:36
Annotation Publication/2018831/25
(Exercises 2.1_IE) Vote
no - Beautiful, Isabella! Only a couple minor adjustments.
September 05, 2018 15:39
Annotation Publication/201895/8
(Ex 2.1_AB) Vote
no - Good work, Andrew! Be sure to review the indirect statement construction. That was a sticking point in these exercises.
September 05, 2018 15:48
Annotation Publication/2018831/27
(cite/perseus/lattb.7817.1) Vote
no - A few more adjustments to non solum...sed etiam. We'll discuss in class.
September 05, 2018 15:55
Annotation Publication/201895/25
(Ex 2.1_GF) Vote
no - Gabriella, these sentences look pretty good, though there are some adjustments to be made. The morphology tags were missing for the last two sentences; you'll also want to see to that. There's no need to send these back for another round; the gold standard is posted online. Make your changes and then compare. Happy to talk through any remaining questions!
September 06, 2018 21:52
Annotation Publication/201896/2
(review3_ah) Vote
no - Fantastic, Anthony! Do try to get in the habit of re-naming your treebanks (instructions under "how to submit"). It will help both of us keep your work straight as the number of files adds up.
September 07, 2018 13:28
Annotation Publication/201895/40
(HW 3.2_IE) Vote
no - These are excellent, Isabella!
September 07, 2018 13:32
Annotation Publication/201895/35
(HW 3.2_AK) Vote
no - Looks good, Adrian! A few minor adjustments.
September 07, 2018 13:45
Annotation Publication/201895/36
(Ex. 3.2_PS) Vote
no - Good work, Paige. Be sure to raise any questions you may have in class today.
September 07, 2018 14:01
Annotation Publication/201896/5
(Ex 3.2_MB) Vote
no - Nice work, Monique! Just a couple of adjustments.
September 07, 2018 14:06
Annotation Publication/201897/2
(3.2_MS) Vote
no - Looking good, Matthew. A few adjustments to make.
September 07, 2018 14:12
Annotation Publication/201896/9
(3.2_GN) Vote
no - Good work, Grant. Let me know if you have questions about how to make these corrections.
September 07, 2018 14:20
Annotation Publication/201897/7
(Ex3.2__MK) Vote
no - I see you have discovered that comments work both ways! Bring up any remaining questions in class.
September 07, 2018 14:32
Annotation Publication/201897/15
(3.2_TM) Vote
no - Good work, Tyler. Review ablative absolutes, relative clauses, and periphrastic verbs--we'll see a lot of these in Cicero.
September 07, 2018 14:44
Annotation Publication/201891/7
(Ex 2.3_SK) Vote
yes - n/a
September 08, 2018 12:15
Annotation Publication/2018831/26
(EX 2.2_AK) Vote
yes - Nice work, Adrian. I don't need to see any further changes, but do note that hominis should hang from the coordinator sed in sentence 6.
September 08, 2018 12:19
Annotation Publication/201893/6
(Ex 2.1_MB) Vote
yes - Flawless!
September 08, 2018 12:20
Annotation Publication/201897/12
(Ex 1.3__AB) Vote
no - Andrew, I apologize that I didn't get this before class (The typo in the label--1.3 instead of 3.1--led me to think that it was a reprise of an older assignment.) Please let me know if you have any further questions. Otherwise, there's no need to resubmit, as you have the gold standard on our CP page.
September 08, 2018 12:37
Annotation Publication/201896/2
(review3_ah) Vote
yes - Looks good, Anthony. I didn't catch on the first round that quidem needs adjustment (adverb modifying interfecto in particular or a sentence adverbial giving emphasis to the whole statement?). No need to resubmit!
September 08, 2018 12:39
Annotation Publication/201895/35
(HW 3.2_AK) Vote
yes - Perfect!
September 09, 2018 18:37
Annotation Publication/201898/25
(PM 25_IE) Vote
no - Looks good, Isabella! Just one adjustment to make.
September 09, 2018 19:02
Annotation Publication/201898/25
(PM 25_IE) Vote
yes - Thanks!
September 09, 2018 19:21
Annotation Publication/201899/13
(Pro Milone 24 ) Vote
no - Hi Anthony, hold on to this one--you'll be going over it in class with a partner. Don't forget though that you do need to submit your sentence from PM 25 (or 26, however the numbers fall). Thanks!
September 10, 2018 00:26
Annotation Publication/2018910/2
(PM25_MB) Vote
no - Nice work, Monique. Just a couple of changes.
September 10, 2018 13:12
Annotation Publication/2018910/3
(PM_25_sentence_2__AB) Vote
no - Nice work, Andrew. Just a few adjustments and some punctuation to take care of.
September 10, 2018 13:28
Annotation Publication/201899/4
(PM24_MSa/DK) Vote
no - Hi Matthew, hold on to this one. You'll be going over it in class with a small group and then submitting. Thanks!
September 10, 2018 13:30
Annotation Publication/201899/14
(PM25_GF) Vote
no - Gabriella, the structure of your tree looks good, as do the labels but you forgot to select JMH's Latin Tagset when you made the tree. To fix this, download the XML and then go to create a new treebank from the home page. Choose your settings (Latin, JMH treebank) BEFORE you upload your XML and it should change the tagset and you'll be able to relabel. On a separate note, try to be a bit more thorough in your work: you've left out plura and several words are missing tags or morphology.
September 10, 2018 13:39
Annotation Publication/2018910/1
(AH Pro Milone 25 Cluster 5) Vote
no - Awesome job on a tough sentence, Anthony. (No worries about the titling).
September 10, 2018 13:57
Annotation Publication/201899/11
(PM 26_AK) Vote
no - Great job with a difficult sentence, Adrian! We'll go over it in class, but do come to office hours if you want to go into more detail.
September 10, 2018 14:16
Annotation Publication/2018910/4
(PM26_DK) Vote
no - Nice job, Duncan. Just a few adjustments.
September 10, 2018 14:28
Annotation Publication/2018910/1
(AH Pro Milone 25 Cluster 5) Vote
yes - Looks good, Anthony!
September 11, 2018 22:33
Annotation Publication/201899/11
(PM 26_AK) Vote
yes - Looks good, Adrian.
September 11, 2018 22:34
Annotation Publication/201896/5
(Ex 3.2_MB) Vote
yes - Good work, Monique. A final change you may want to make: quidem is a sentence adverbial (AuxY), which is essentially what you are saying by labeling it as ADV_CO and hanging it from the comma so that it applies to all of the coordinated phrases.
September 11, 2018 22:36
Annotation Publication/2018910/2
(PM25_MB) Vote
yes - Perfect!
September 11, 2018 22:37
Annotation Publication/2018911/17
(PM28_MSa(#11)) Vote
no - Very nice job with a tough sentence Matthew. See notes.
September 12, 2018 13:11
Annotation Publication/2018911/12
(PM 28_PS) Vote
no - Very good work on an extremely difficult sentence, Paige. Hang on to your treebank for now and be ready to lend a hand to whoever gets the job of translating this one in class.
September 12, 2018 13:37
Annotation Publication/2018911/5
(PM29_MB) Vote
no - Good, Monique.
September 12, 2018 13:58
Annotation Publication/2018912/4
(PM_29_sentence_2__AB) Vote
no - This is really great work on a tough sentence, Andrew!
September 12, 2018 16:46
Annotation Publication/2018911/2
(PM 29_IE) Vote
no - Fantastic job, Isabella, with an incredibly nasty sentence. We probably won't get to this one in class today, so hold on to your treebank until Friday when I hope you'll help us untangle this mess.
September 12, 2018 17:17
Annotation Publication/2018912/5
(PM24.7_MK) Vote
no - Let me know if you have further questions, Max.
September 12, 2018 23:14
Annotation Publication/2018914/1
(PM30_DK) Vote
yes - You didn't need to submit, Duncan, but it's always nice to see a perfect sentence!
September 14, 2018 14:40
Annotation Publication/2018911/2
(PM 29_IE) Vote
no - Good work, Isabella. Take a look at these comments and then we should be able to iron out the last few issues in class today.
September 14, 2018 14:47
Annotation Publication/2018917/11
(PM 45_IE) Vote
no - These sentences are already in great shape, Isabella. See comments for adjustments. Laus tibi for starting early!
September 18, 2018 20:25
Annotation Publication/2018919/5
(PM_44__AB) Vote
no - Looks good, Andrew. Just a few corrections. Take a look also at the commentary on post...quam. (There is another way to construe the clause, but the way you have it is grammatical as well.)
September 19, 2018 16:40
Annotation Publication/2018917/11
(PM 45_IE) Vote
no - Great! a few more refinements and they are ready to post.
September 19, 2018 16:52
Annotation Publication/2018918/3
(PM43_MB) Vote
no - These sentences are in good shape, Monique. Just a few changes, in particular with the relative clauses.
September 20, 2018 19:32
Annotation Publication/2018917/11
(PM 45_IE) Vote
no - Two minor changes, Isabella. I'm going to go ahead and post the link on coursepress, but you should still resubmit so that I can officially approve it
September 20, 2018 19:40
Annotation Publication/2018918/3
(PM43_MB) Vote
no - Nice job Monique. Just two changes.
September 21, 2018 12:44
Annotation Publication/2018918/22
(PM 49_AK) Vote
no - Nice work Adrian. The last two sentences are quite tricky. Concentrate on getting the main clause straight, and then identify how the subordinate branches relate to the elements of the main clause.
September 21, 2018 15:51
Annotation Publication/2018918/3
(PM43_MB) Vote
yes - Great!
September 21, 2018 16:22
Annotation Publication/2018922/14
(ProMilone_46_AH_draft4) Vote
no - Nice work, Anthony. Some big changes for sentence 2 and minor adjustments elsewhere.
September 23, 2018 13:43
Annotation Publication/2018918/22
(PM 49_AK) Vote
no - A few more changes, Adrian.
September 23, 2018 14:40
Annotation Publication/2018918/22
(PM 49_AK) Vote
yes - Great work! I'll post it on our course press now.
September 23, 2018 20:59
Annotation Publication/2018922/14
(ProMilone_46_AH_draft4) Vote
no - A few more tweaks.
September 23, 2018 21:15
Annotation Publication/2018922/14
(ProMilone_46_AH_draft4) Vote
no - Just this last comment on sentence 2, which I think got lost in the other comments from the last round: si as the subordinating conjunction will govern ni and the nouns in apposition. For the sake of consistency, use the , between Patinam and familiarissimum to balance the apposition. (Using another word will create trouble in other situations.)
September 23, 2018 23:19
Annotation Publication/2018922/14
(ProMilone_46_AH_draft4) Vote
yes - Great! Thanks for your diligence, Anthony.
September 23, 2018 23:36
Annotation Publication/2018923/11
(PM 53_PS) Vote
no - Now that is a Ciceronian sentence... Try to rearrange and then put on some syntax labels.
September 27, 2018 17:06
Annotation Publication/2018924/11
(PM_56_IE) Vote
no - Good start!
September 27, 2018 18:03
Annotation Publication/2018927/7
(PM48_MK) Vote
no - A good start, Max. See my comments
September 27, 2018 22:09
Annotation Publication/2018925/22
(PM_50_TM) Vote
no - nice work Tyler. Some corrections to make throughout: when a main verb is subjunctive, you need to use the secondary PRED menu to say what use of the independent subjunctive we have. Also, whenever you have words or stems coordinated by ET/-QUE that share a modifier, that modifier will hang from the COORD and receive a secondary _CO tag.
September 28, 2018 13:01
Annotation Publication/2018927/7
(PM48_MK) Vote
no - Hi Max. I think it would be productive for us to go through these sentences together this afternoon and make the corrections. I'm sending it back w/o comments so that we can use your account and save the changes.
September 28, 2018 13:05
Annotation Publication/2018927/3
(Pro Milone 51) Vote
no - Hi Matthew, These are in pretty good shape. Only a few corrections to make. Let me know if treebanking relative clauses is still unclear after reading through the comments and we can discuss in person.
September 28, 2018 15:27
Annotation Publication/2018924/11
(PM_56_IE) Vote
no - Hi Isabella, your work here is done--thanks for acting so far in advance. I do want to point out one grammar point to you, though: sic... ut indicative = comparative clause BUT sic... ut subjunctive = result clause.
September 28, 2018 21:38
Annotation Publication/2018925/22
(PM_50_TM) Vote
no - Hi Tyler, go ahead and make any adjustments you'd like following our discussion in class and then resubmit. Feel free to email me if you don't understand a comment.
September 28, 2018 21:44
Annotation Publication/2018927/7
(PM48_MK) Vote
yes - Thanks, Max.
September 28, 2018 21:44
Annotation Publication/2018927/3
(Pro Milone 51) Vote
yes - Nice work, Matthew! One change to look for in the gold standard is the coordination in sentence 3. Enjoy your weekend.
September 28, 2018 21:52
Annotation Publication/2018924/11
(PM_56_IE) Vote
yes - Thanks!
September 29, 2018 13:55
Annotation Publication/2018929/15
(cite/perseus/lattb.8024.1) Vote
yes - Hi Duncan, other students have asked me about these sentences, so I'm going to go ahead and accept and make the changes necessary to post a gold standard. Be sure to look over the new treebank and let me know if you have any questions about why it is the way it is. Thanks, J
September 29, 2018 15:22
Annotation Publication/2018926/1
(PM54_MB) Vote
no - Very few mistakes to fix, Monique. These looked great!
September 29, 2018 17:38
Annotation Publication/2018923/11
(PM 53_PS) Vote
no - This really is a terrible sentence! But you are doing good work, Paige. I was a bit more thorough in my comments this time, so be sure you read through all of the sentences and comments. There were a couple of places where the case was wrong--make sure you go back and fix this in the morphology tab too.
September 29, 2018 18:26
Annotation Publication/2018926/1
(PM54_MB) Vote
yes - Good work, Monique. Be sure to look at the GS for a couple minor changes (mainly sentence 1)
September 30, 2018 14:18
Annotation Publication/2018923/11
(PM 53_PS) Vote
yes - All set, Paige. Make sure you check the GS for modifications.
October 01, 2018 12:48
Annotation Publication/2018930/15
(Pro_Milone_57_AH_Draft_2) Vote
no - These were excellent, Anthony! A few adjustments and I think you'll be all set. FYI: in abl = abl of location. Thanks for your patience.
October 01, 2018 19:12
Annotation Publication/2018930/15
(Pro_Milone_57_AH_Draft_2) Vote
yes - Looks good, Anthony. Keep an eye out when I post the GS for a few minor changes.
October 02, 2018 13:49
Annotation Publication/2018928/4
(cite/perseus/lattb.8013.1) Vote
yes - For the sake of efficiency, I'm going to make some corrections and post a GS, Mizel. Make sure you go over it carefully to see what changes I've made and let me know if you have questions about them.
October 02, 2018 19:52
Annotation Publication/2018103/1
(PM 55) Vote
no - Good start, Andrew. This is a very elliptical passage, so you'll need to add quite a few words in order to show all of the dependencies accurately. Other than that, grammar generally looked good.
October 03, 2018 14:06
Annotation Publication/2018103/1
(PM 55) Vote
yes - Nice work, Andrew. 18/20 (A-)
October 05, 2018 21:23
Annotation Publication/2018108/6
(PM 60_AK) Vote
no - Good work, Adrian. A few adjustments and you'll be all set.
October 09, 2018 21:27
Annotation Publication/2018108/7
(PM_61_TM) Vote
no - Great job getting an early start on your section, Tyler! This was a long chunk with some tough spots, and you've already gotten it in pretty good shape. See my comments. There are few punctuation and other small items that I did comment on in this round. Take care of them if you spot them, but otherwise they are minor enough to be overlooked for now.
October 09, 2018 22:27
Annotation Publication/2018108/6
(PM 60_AK) Vote
yes - Nice job, Adrian. 20/20. Be sure to check the GS when it's posted for some minor changes.
October 10, 2018 13:21
Annotation Publication/2018109/26
(PM59_MK) Vote
no - Good start, Max. See my comments.
October 11, 2018 14:08
Annotation Publication/2018109/26
(PM59_MK) Vote
yes - All good! Look out for a few more tweaks in the GS 20/20
October 12, 2018 15:45
Annotation Publication/2018109/1
(Pro Milone 62) Vote
no - Good work, Matthew. Just a few changes. Review the different kinds of genitives in the grammar of your choice. (Harrington's grammar gives a nice short synopsis of each all in one place. It's available on our resources page.)
October 12, 2018 20:28
Annotation Publication/2018108/7
(PM_61_TM) Vote
no - Good, Tyler. I think you can polish this section off in one more go if you read through the notes carefully. It starts to get jumbled after multiple rounds. Remember, too, that you can also reply to my comments if you don't understand what I am saying.
October 12, 2018 20:54
Annotation Publication/20181011/30
(PM 64_PS) Vote
no - A deceptively difficult sentence! see my notes.
October 12, 2018 21:06
Annotation Publication/2018109/1
(Pro Milone 62) Vote
yes - Nice work, Matthew! Fewer than three minor changes to be made, so your work here is done. I'll post the GS and send you an email answering your questions tomorrow morning. 20/20
October 14, 2018 02:04
Annotation Publication/20181011/30
(PM 64_PS) Vote
yes - Good work, Paige. 20/20. Check the GS for corrections (to the RC and the placement of the protasis).
October 14, 2018 19:24
Annotation Publication/2018108/7
(PM_61_TM) Vote
yes - Good, Tyler. 20/20. Look for minor changes to the GS.
October 15, 2018 13:39
Annotation Publication/20181014/1
(cite/perseus/lattb.8194.1) Vote
no - A tough first sentence, Mizel. We'll go over it in detail in class. I recommend splitting it in half at the semicolon and adding an elided arbitrabantur. (There are directions for how to edit the XML in Harrington's treebanking guide, but I can also show you before/after class).
October 15, 2018 14:43
Annotation Publication/20181015/17
(PM 72_PS) Vote
no - Good start, Paige. I left comments on what you've done so far. Hope the conference goes well this week!
October 17, 2018 14:02
Annotation Publication/20181018/6
(PM 74) Vote
no - Nice work, Andrew. See my comments for some corrections.
October 19, 2018 16:31
Annotation Publication/20181015/17
(PM 72_PS) Vote
no - A few more changes, Paige.
October 19, 2018 16:49
Annotation Publication/20181017/20
(PM 75_IE) Vote
no - Good work, Isabella. See my corrections.
October 19, 2018 17:47
Annotation Publication/20181019/1
(PM73_MB) Vote
no - Great job, Monique! Only 4 corrections, though you might also include the elided MV "occidi" off the root of each sentence.
October 19, 2018 21:59
Annotation Publication/20181015/17
(PM 72_PS) Vote
yes - Nice work, Paige. Be sure to check the GS for a few further changes.
October 19, 2018 22:01
Annotation Publication/20181018/6
(PM 74) Vote
yes - Approved! Beautiful job with sentence 3, by the way.
October 19, 2018 22:04
Annotation Publication/20181014/1
(cite/perseus/lattb.8194.1) Vote
yes - Thanks, Mizel. 14/20
October 20, 2018 13:09
Annotation Publication/20181019/1
(PM73_MB) Vote
yes - Excellent, Monique! 20/20
October 20, 2018 13:27
Annotation Publication/20181020/2
(DuncanKhosla58PM) Vote
yes - See GS, just posted, for corrections.
October 20, 2018 17:32
Annotation Publication/20181017/20
(PM 75_IE) Vote
yes - Nice, Isabella. Look for a couple of changes in sentence 1 when I post the GS. 20/20
October 21, 2018 18:34
Annotation Publication/20181022/3
(PM_76_AH_draft_2) Vote
no - Nice, Anthony. No worries about the sentence split. I'll fix it on my end once I've accepted.
October 22, 2018 19:21
Annotation Publication/20181022/3
(PM_76_AH_draft_2) Vote
yes - All good. 20/20. Look for a few changes in the GS, mostly dealing with coordination formatting. I have an answer for you for apposition vs coordination: strictly defined, apposition is a noun modifying another noun to further describe it. I see your reasoning, but it would introduce unnecessary complications to broaden the definition to include the lists and rephrasings that Cicero is so fond of. I accidentally skipped sentence 3 on my first pass--this is also going to qualify as coord not apos. Check out A and G for more http://dcc.dickinson.edu/grammar/latin/agreement-nouns
October 22, 2018 22:07
Annotation Publication/20181023/7
(PM 79_AK) Vote
no - Good work, Adrian. The conditionals in relative clauses are tough to keep straight! let me know if you have other questions (which may be easier to address via email)
October 24, 2018 14:14
Annotation Publication/20181023/15
(MK_PM78) Vote
no - These look pretty good, Max. We'll iron it out later today.
October 24, 2018 14:32
Annotation Publication/20181023/7
(PM 79_AK) Vote
yes - Nice job, Adrian. Your work here is done. Look for a handful of changes to the GS, mainly sentence 3.
October 25, 2018 12:20
Annotation Publication/20181023/15
(MK_PM78) Vote
yes - 20/20
October 25, 2018 12:21
Annotation Publication/20181026/19
(PM77_DK) Vote
no - Looking pretty good, Duncan. Read my comments before class if you can, feel free to ask questions in class, and we can chat afterwards if needed.
October 26, 2018 14:13
Annotation Publication/20181026/19
(PM77_DK) Vote
yes - Thanks, Duncan. 15/20
October 27, 2018 13:12
Annotation Publication/20181026/24
(Treebank Section 80_TM) Vote
no - Already in pretty good shape, Tyler. A handful of minor things and just one or two big adjustments.
October 27, 2018 21:49
Annotation Publication/20181026/24
(Treebank Section 80_TM) Vote
yes - All set, Tyler. Be sure to check the gold standard for some changes when it's posted. 20/20
October 29, 2018 01:47
Annotation Publication/2018117/34
(DRP 9) Vote
no - Good work, Matthew. It's really important that you are able to define your questions so well! Let me know if anything needs further explanation.
November 08, 2018 13:17
Annotation Publication/2018119/38
(cite/perseus/lattb.8449.1) Vote
no - Take a look at my notes Mizel and let me know if you have questions.
November 09, 2018 17:03
Annotation Publication/2018118/24
(DRP 11_PS) Vote
yes - Good! A few changes to be made, and feel free to ask questions in class.
November 09, 2018 17:32
Annotation Publication/2018118/26
(DRP12_MB) Vote
yes - Good, Monique! Let me know if you have further questions
November 09, 2018 17:50
Annotation Publication/2018119/37
(DRP 13) Vote
no - Good, Andrew! Just a couple changes.
November 09, 2018 18:24
Annotation Publication/2018119/64
(DRP 11_PS (2)) Vote
no - Thanks, Paige.
November 09, 2018 22:13
Annotation Publication/2018117/34
(DRP 9) Vote
yes - All set! I'll make a couple of changes before posting the GS, but to answer your question about potius--yes, we'll make it Nom_Pred and hang it off of the verb. 20/20
November 09, 2018 22:18
Annotation Publication/2018118/36
(DRP 14_IE) Vote
no - Good start!
November 09, 2018 22:43
Annotation Publication/20181110/20
(DRP 11_PS (take 3)) Vote
no - Very close! Should be our last round.
November 10, 2018 22:01
Annotation Publication/2018118/36
(DRP 14_IE) Vote
yes - Your work is done! Look for some changes in the GS. 20/20
November 10, 2018 22:04
Annotation Publication/20181110/22
(DRP 20) Vote
no - Wow, what a complicated set of sentences! You should feel good about what you accomplished in the first pass. I'll get back to you about the genitive in sentence 4. As for sentence 5, I mainly made comments on getting the 4 indirect statements straight. In the next round, I'll look more closely at the rest of the coordination.
November 11, 2018 23:35
Annotation Publication/20181110/20
(DRP 11_PS (take 3)) Vote
yes - Accepted with enthusiasm! Good work, Paige. 20/20
November 11, 2018 23:37
Annotation Publication/2018119/37
(DRP 13) Vote
yes - Good! 20/20
November 12, 2018 15:36
Annotation Publication/20181110/23
(DRP_15_draft1_AH) Vote
yes - These are in good shape, Anthony. A few tweaks.
November 12, 2018 15:52
Annotation Publication/20181110/22
(DRP 20) Vote
no - Great, Matthew! This should be our last round. Be sure to look through the comments carefully though. It gets confusing when they start to pile up. Afraid I don't have an answer for you yet on sermonis--going to ask a colleague next time I see her.
November 12, 2018 22:21
Annotation Publication/2018119/38
(cite/perseus/lattb.8449.1) Vote
yes - Solid work, Mizel. Checking the commentary would have helped you out in some places--there's a copy in the Classics Library that you can make scans of if you'd rather not buy the book. 16/20
November 13, 2018 16:44
Annotation Publication/20181112/21
(DRP 18_AK) Vote
no - Well done, Adrian. This is a tough section. If you want to/have time to send it back again today, I'll get it back to you asap.
November 13, 2018 17:48
Annotation Publication/20181111/10
(DRP 22_PS) Vote
no - Good, Paige.
November 13, 2018 18:38
Annotation Publication/20181112/21
(DRP 18_AK) Vote
yes - Fewer than 3 changes, so your work here is done. 20/20
November 13, 2018 21:40
Annotation Publication/20181111/10
(DRP 22_PS) Vote
yes - Fewer than 3 changes, so your work here is done! 20/20
November 13, 2018 21:42
Annotation Publication/20181112/41
(MK_SS17) Vote
no - not bad! Since you've looked at this passage most closely, I'll be relying on you to ask questions and help us sort this out tomorrow.
November 13, 2018 22:14
Annotation Publication/20181114/2
(DRP Chapter 19) Vote
no - Good work, Tyler. You have until 5 pm on friday to submit your final version.
November 14, 2018 22:10
Annotation Publication/20181110/22
(DRP 20) Vote
yes - Good, Matthew. Remind me to address your maculis question in class 20/20
November 14, 2018 22:14
Annotation Publication/20181112/41
(MK_SS17) Vote
yes - Thanks, Max.
November 15, 2018 14:57
Annotation Publication/20181114/30
(DRP23_MB) Vote
no - Good, Monique. Since this section is short, I took the opportunity to get into some nitty gritty grammatical points. Please feel free to follow up with questions!
November 15, 2018 15:30
Annotation Publication/20181114/30
(DRP23_MB) Vote
yes - Good work! 20/20
November 15, 2018 21:30
Annotation Publication/20181116/1
(cite/perseus/lattb.8541.1) Vote
no - Good, Mizel. You have until 5 pm today to submit your final version.
November 16, 2018 15:04
Annotation Publication/20181117/3
(DRP 29_AK) Vote
no - A strong finish! Just a few tweaks to be made.
November 19, 2018 21:55
Annotation Publication/20181118/3
(cite/perseus/lattb.8552.1) Vote
no - Good, Isabella. A few corrections. Let me know if my explanation of the coordination in the last sentence doesn't make sense.
November 19, 2018 22:17
Annotation Publication/20181114/2
(DRP Chapter 19) Vote
yes - Good work, Tyler. Look for some changes in the GS. 18/20
November 20, 2018 19:21
Annotation Publication/20181118/3
(cite/perseus/lattb.8552.1) Vote
yes - All good! 20/20
November 20, 2018 19:32
Annotation Publication/20181117/3
(DRP 29_AK) Vote
yes - Perfect. 20/20
November 20, 2018 19:42
Annotation Publication/20181121/7
(DRP 24) Vote
no - Good work, Andrew. Sentence 5 was tough! Let me know if my notes are unclear.
November 24, 2018 14:03
Annotation Publication/20181124/6
(DRP_26_Draft_1_AH) Vote
no - Good, Anthony. It's really just keeping the coordination straight that threw you off in 6. Give these comments a read and let me know if they aren't clear enough.
November 25, 2018 17:53
Annotation Publication/20181116/1
(cite/perseus/lattb.8541.1) Vote
yes - Thanks, Mizel. 15/20
November 25, 2018 17:53
Annotation Publication/20181124/6
(DRP_26_Draft_1_AH) Vote
yes - Good! Look for a few adjustments in the GS.. 20/20
November 25, 2018 19:26
Annotation Publication/20181121/7
(DRP 24) Vote
yes - Good Andrew. Look for some changes in the GS today in class 20/20
November 26, 2018 14:43
Annotation Publication/20181126/10
(MK_DRP28) Vote
no - Great job, Max! I think you can handle these corrections on your own, actually. Try to find time to make another submission before class and I think we'll have taken care of it. (Of course, I'm available to go over whatever in office hours.)
November 27, 2018 14:13
Annotation Publication/20181126/10
(MK_DRP28) Vote
no - Just a couple of changes left for sentence 1.
November 27, 2018 18:33
Annotation Publication/20181120/16
(Epistulae 15.6) Vote
no - Good work, Matthew.
November 29, 2018 16:52
Annotation Publication/20181128/16
(Letter 15 9-10_PS) Vote
no - Apologies for the delay, Paige. I think these comments will get you to the point that you can try labeling everything.
December 01, 2018 23:40
Annotation Publication/20181120/16
(Epistulae 15.6) Vote
yes - Great work, Matthew! 20/20
December 01, 2018 23:40
Annotation Publication/20181128/16
(Letter 15 9-10_PS) Vote
no - Good job, Paige! Getting close.
December 03, 2018 02:05
Annotation Publication/20181128/16
(Letter 15 9-10_PS) Vote
yes - NIce job, Paige. We'll make a few more corrections as part of our review today in class. 20/20
December 03, 2018 15:10
Annotation Publication/2018122/7
(15.1 letter) Vote
no - Good work, Tyler. We're going to do peer reviews of treebanks in class today. So, if you can, bring your computer to make changes on the spot.
December 03, 2018 15:50
Annotation Publication/2018123/21
(cite/perseus/lattb.8724.1) Vote
no - Nice work, Mizel. We're doing peer reviews of treebanks in class today, so, if you can, bring your computer and you'll be able to make changes on the spot.
December 03, 2018 16:28
Annotation Publication/2018122/7
(15.1 letter) Vote
yes - Nice work, Tyler. 17/20
December 09, 2018 14:12
Annotation Publication/2018123/21
(cite/perseus/lattb.8724.1) Vote
yes - Thanks, Mizel. 15/20
December 10, 2018 13:35
Annotation Publication/20181126/10
(MK_DRP28) Vote
yes - 19/20.
December 12, 2018 17:08
Annotation Publication/2019215/6
(Matt and Louis 2/15/19) Vote
no - Nice job, Matt and Louis. Please see my comments by going to the "comments" tab in the editor. There's no need for further action, but feel free to follow up with questions. Matt: you'll need to send Louis a link to view my comments. From the editor page (Ie where you do the diagramming), copy and paste the web address.
February 19, 2019 13:48
Annotation Publication/2019216/2
(cite/perseus/ScottTrevorTreeBank) Vote
yes - Amazing! No corrections or comments to be had. Great job!
February 19, 2019 13:52
Annotation Publication/2019215/11
(Jaeger Johnson, Lydia Burleson, Seongsoo 2/15) Vote
no - Nice job, Jaeger, Lydia, and Seongsoo. There are a few comments on the sentences, which you can access through the "comments" tab in the editor. This is just meant as food for thought--no further action needed--but feel free to bring up any questions you may have. Jaeger: you'll need to send Lydia and Seongsoo a link for them to view the comments. Enter the editor (ie the screen where you do the diagramming) and copy and paste the URL.
February 19, 2019 14:00
Annotation Publication/2019215/12
(Paul Stankey and Israel Yolou 2/15) Vote
no - Nice work! Of what you completed, all looks good. I'll post a "gold standard" on our lab resources for you to compare. (Paul: Please pass this message along to Israel)
February 19, 2019 14:07
Annotation Publication/2019215/8
(Sam Bray and Sean Johnson) Vote
no - Great work, Sam and Sean! You can see my comments by entering the editor and clicking on the "comments" tab. No further action needed, but let me know if you have questions. I'll post a completed version on our Lab Resources Page. (Sam: please pass this message on to Sean, and send him a link to the treebank. To do this, enter the editor (ie, the screen where you do the diagramming) and copy and paste the URL).
February 19, 2019 14:11
Annotation Publication/2019215/10
(Jared and Bailey Group 1) Vote
no - Excellent work, Jared and Bailey! You can view my comments by entering the editor and clicking on the "comments" tab. No further action needed at the moment, but feel free to ask further questions. I'll post a corrected version on our Lab Resources Page. (Jared: can you pass this message and a link to the treebank on to Bailey? To do that, enter the editor (ie where you do the diagramming) and copy and paste the URL. Thanks!)
February 19, 2019 14:15
Annotation Publication/2019215/2
(Aaron Farr -- In-Class Tree-Banking Group #3) Vote
no - Excellent work, Aaron and co! You can view my comments by entering the editor and clicking on the "comments" tab. No further action needed at the moment, but feel free to ask further questions. I'll post a corrected version on our Lab Resources Page. (Aaron: can you pass this message and a link to the treebank on to the rest of your group? To do that, enter the editor (ie where you do the diagramming) and copy and paste the URL. Thanks!)
February 19, 2019 14:20
Annotation Publication/2019215/4
(Treebank 1 Sentence 2) Vote
no - Excellent work, Nathan! You can view my comments by entering the editor and clicking on the "comments" tab. No further action needed at the moment, but feel free to ask further questions. I'll post a corrected version on our Lab Resources Page. (Nathan: can you pass this message and a link to the treebank on to the rest of your group? To do that, enter the editor (ie where you do the diagramming) and copy and paste the URL. Thanks!)
February 19, 2019 14:23
Annotation Publication/2019219/3
(Lucy Treebanking 1) Vote
no - Excellent work, Lucy! Of what you completed, it looks good. You can view my comments by entering the editor and clicking on the "comments" tab. No further action needed at the moment, but feel free to ask further questions. I'll post a corrected version on our Lab Resources Page.
February 19, 2019 14:25
/>